Data platforms built to deliver value, not to be rebuilt
Forty percent of data engineering teams spend more than half their time fixing data quality issues rather than building new capabilities. BCS data platform setup engagements deploy deKorvai quality gates, Symphony orchestration, and Anugal access governance as part of the build, so the platform operates correctly from the first production day.
of data teams spend over half their time on pipeline fixes rather than new capability delivery
monthly cost of poor data pipeline quality in mid-market enterprises
average cloud infrastructure spend wasted in ungoverned data environments
Three things BCS does before every other consultancy starts building
Most delivery programmes begin at the solution layer. BCS begins at the evidence layer, measuring what exists before proposing what to build. That sequence is what separates recommendations with a measurable outcome from plans that look credible at presentation and fail in execution.
Measure before designing
deKorvai quality baseline established before any architecture decision is made. Every recommendation is grounded in measured evidence from the current data estate, not assumptions from stakeholder interviews.
Automate from the first sprint
Symphony automation scope identified and embedded in the delivery roadmap during the engagement itself, not proposed as a separate follow-on programme after delivery concludes.
Govern from day one
Anugal access governance and data classification policies are designed as part of the solution architecture and active from the first production dataset, not retrofitted after the platform is in use.
3 reasons enterprise data platform builds underdeliver
Data platform failures follow a consistent pattern. The technical choices are rarely the primary cause. The root causes are in what was not established before the build began.
Platform architecture chosen before data quality is measured
Platforms designed for clean, structured, high-volume data inherit all the quality issues that exist in the source estate at the point of first ingestion. Data quality remediation then happens inside the platform at a cost that exceeds the original build budget. The platform architected for analytics serves as a data cleansing environment for the first year of operation.
Pipeline deployment is manual, making operations reactive from go-live
Data pipelines deployed without automated deployment governance accumulate configuration drift immediately. Each manual deployment introduces small variations that compound over months until the pipeline estate is too fragile to change without unplanned downtime. Operations teams that inherit a manually deployed pipeline estate spend the majority of their time on incidents rather than improvements.
Cost governance added after the cloud bill arrives, not at build
Data platforms provisioned without cost allocation tagging, budget alert policies, and resource lifecycle governance produce the first surprise cloud bill within 60 days of go-live. Retrofitting cost governance into a running platform requires compute downtime and architectural changes that would have cost a fraction of their remediation price if built in at setup.
What the data platform setup engagement delivers
Platform architecture matched to the actual data estate
Architecture is designed against a deKorvai quality baseline measuring real data volumes, quality levels, and ingestion patterns, not vendor-demonstration assumptions.
Symphony-deployed pipelines with version-controlled infrastructure
Every pipeline deploys through a Symphony-orchestrated sequence — validate, stage, test, promote — with infrastructure-as-code, eliminating configuration drift from the first deployment.
deKorvai quality gates enforced at every ingestion boundary
Data failing quality checks is quarantined and escalated at each ingestion point rather than silently promoted to contaminate downstream reports and models.
Cost governance and allocation wired in at build, not retrofitted
Cost allocation tagging, budget alerts, and resource lifecycle governance are configured at build so the first cloud bill arrives with full visibility rather than triggering a retrospective cost programme.
Anugal-governed access model from day one of platform operation
Role-based access, domain permissions, and time-bound external access are configured at build, with build-phase access revoked at go-live rather than discovered in a later review.
Operations team inherits runbooks, not a platform that needs documenting
Symphony runbooks covering monitoring, alerting, restarts, and incident response are built and tested before handover, so operations teams inherit a platform they can run immediately.
How BCS builds a data platform that operates from day one
BCS platform setup engagements follow five phases that move from assessment through to a production-ready platform with quality gates, orchestration, and access governance active before the first business dataset arrives.
Assessment & Architecture
Profile the existing environment, define target architecture, select platform components, and scope the build programme against the data volumes, integration patterns, and quality requirements of the specific organisation.
Infrastructure Provisioning
Provision the target cloud or hybrid infrastructure with Symphony-orchestrated deployment scripts. Security groups, network configuration, IAM policies, and cost governance controls are applied from the initial provisioning run.
Pipeline Build and Quality Gates
Build ingestion, transformation, and serving pipelines with deKorvai quality gates at each stage. Pipeline failures are routed to resolution workflows rather than silently corrupting downstream data.
Access Governance Configuration
Define Anugal access policies aligned to data classification and business role. Access controls are active from the first dataset loaded, not configured after the platform is in use.
Handover and Operational Baseline
Establish Symphony runbooks for routine platform operations, complete platform documentation, and hand over to the operational team or BCS managed service with a defined quality and performance baseline in place.
What the platform setup engagement covers
BCS delivers data platform setup across the full technology stack, from architecture design through to production-ready infrastructure with governance, quality, and operational automation in place at go-live.
Azure Synapse Analytics
Architecture, build, and pipeline deployment for Azure Synapse Analytics environments. Lake database configuration, dedicated SQL pool sizing, Synapse Link for SAP, and integration with Azure Data Factory and Databricks.
AWS Redshift and Data Lake
Redshift cluster architecture, S3 data lake layer design, Glue ETL pipeline setup, and Lake Formation governance configuration. Serverless and provisioned deployment depending on the workload profile.
GCP BigQuery and Dataflow
BigQuery dataset architecture, slot reservation model, Dataflow pipeline design, and Looker integration. Storage and compute separation for cost-optimal analytics at scale on Google Cloud Platform.
SAP Datasphere
SAP Datasphere space design, semantic layer modelling, replication flow configuration from S/4HANA and ECC, and federation setup for hybrid analytics environments alongside non-SAP cloud data platforms.
SAP BW and BW/4HANA
SAP BW architecture design, InfoObject and DataStore Object modelling, BW/4HANA migration planning, and hybrid SAP analytics configuration alongside SAP Analytics Cloud and Datasphere.
Data Lakehouse Architecture
Open table format implementation (Delta Lake, Apache Iceberg, Apache Hudi) on cloud storage with Databricks, Spark, or cloud-native query engines. Single data layer combining batch and streaming workloads.
Symphony Pipeline Deployment
All pipeline deployments orchestrated through Symphony, with version-controlled infrastructure-as-code, automated testing gates, staged promotion across environments, and rollback capability at every release stage.
deKorvai Quality Gates
Automated data quality checks configured at every ingestion boundary: raw zone intake, cleansing layer promotion, and serving layer release. Quality failures quarantined and escalated before downstream consumption.
Platform Cost and Access Governance
Cost allocation tagging, budget policies, and resource lifecycle governance are built at platform setup. Anugal-governed data access roles are configured from day one. Cost and access visibility is available from the first production workload, not the first surprise bill.
The platforms embedded in the data platform from the first day of operation
Platform Provisioning and Go-live Automation
Symphony
Symphony orchestrates data platform provisioning sequences, environment configuration, and go-live validation across infrastructure, pipeline, and security layers. The platform is handed over as a governed, automated environment rather than a documented build.
- Infrastructure provisioning orchestration across compute, storage, and network layers
- Environment configuration sequencing enforcing dependency order at every stage
- Go-live validation execution confirming platform readiness before user access
- Runbook automation embedded in the platform at handover, not added later
Platform Configuration Validation
deKorvai
deKorvai validates platform configuration at each setup stage, detecting drift between what was specified and what is deployed. Pre-go-live validation catches configuration errors before users and pipelines depend on the environment.
- Configuration drift detection between specification and deployed platform state
- Pre-go-live validation confirming all layers match the agreed baseline
- Database and schema integrity verification before pipeline onboarding
- Post-setup configuration reporting as the platform acceptance evidence package
Platform Access Design and Governance
Anugal
Anugal designs and implements the access model for the new data platform from day one, ensuring the right roles, permissions, and governance controls are in place before any data is loaded.
- Data platform role and permission design aligned to governance requirements
- Access control implementation across all platform layers at go-live
- Sensitive data access policy enforcement from the first day of operation
- Access governance framework handed over as ongoing platform operating procedure
What makes BCS different from every other data platform partner
BCS has built data platforms on Azure, AWS, GCP, SAP Datasphere, and SAP BW/4HANA for enterprise clients in manufacturing, financial services, healthcare, and retail. The difference between a BCS-built platform and a standard delivery is the operational baseline on day one.
Quality governance built in, not bolted on
deKorvai quality gates are implemented as part of pipeline construction. The platform the business receives has quality governance embedded in its architecture, not scheduled for a follow-on workstream.
SAP and cloud from a single build team
BCS engineers build SAP Datasphere, BW/4HANA, and cloud data platforms within the same engagement. Cross-platform integration is handled without a seam between specialist teams.
Symphony automation active at handover
Platform runbooks written during the build programme mean the operational team receives a system with defined automation behaviours, not a platform they need to learn to operate manually before automation is added.
Cost governance configured from infrastructure day one
Cloud spend controls, reserved capacity policies, and budget alerts are provisioned as part of the infrastructure build. Cost overruns caused by ungoverned resource consumption are prevented at the architecture layer.
Platform build informs the managed service
Where BCS provides ongoing data platform management, the build team hands over the architecture knowledge, quality baseline, and Symphony runbooks directly to the operations team, eliminating the ramp-up period that external managed service handovers generate.
Ready to stop building platforms that need to be rebuilt?
BCS platform setup engagements deploy quality gates, orchestration, and access governance as part of the build, not as follow-on projects. Book a platform assessment to scope what a properly built data platform looks like for the current environment.